Two weeks back, The Goldfinch — the new motion picture dependent on Donna Tartt's Pulitzer Prize-winning 2013 novel — landed in theaters and quickly, calamitously, floundered. The Goldfinch made just $2.6 million in its opening end of the week, the 6th most noticeably awful opening ever for a film opening on in excess of 2,500 distinct screens, which is a particularly sad starting given that it cost $45 million to make. What's more, pundits were no kinder than the movies; right now, The Goldfinch has a rating of 27 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. At Vox, film pundit Alissa Wilkinson reasoned that the story just "doesn't chip away at screen." I'd prefer to go above and beyond. The issue isn't only that The Goldfinch doesn't take a shot at the screen. Actually, the explanation The Goldfinch doesn't chip away at the screen is that it doesn't generally take a shot at the page either. It's an empty, specifically void book loaded up with empty, menta
Comments
Post a Comment